lmbo @ Ixas...

    • Gold Top Dog

    lmbo @ Ixas...

    trying soo hard to stir the poo poo....

    "can you change the rule to say what it says already...except more the way I want it to say, what it says already?"

    • Gold Top Dog

     Yes indeed.  I'm going to reply, just composing in my head.

    • Gold Top Dog

    She did the same Gina when PC was writing the new rules.  I don't know if you'd stepped down by then or not.  But EVERYTHING had to be reworded HER way to say the exact same thing only "better".  I did reply to her post, but I actually behaved rather nicely.....all things considered.

    Since when he she espencers champion?

    • Gold Top Dog

    They've always been friendly from what I can tell.  

    I am happy with the way it is worded....I ran it past you guys and sent it to Jill and Jaime.  She's just trying to get us to bow down to her wishes...to have some influence.

    Contrary to what she thinks, the rule is NOT "aimed at" any one person.  Just because it happened to be one particular person who brought to our attention the potential for problems in that department, doesn't mean it's not valid for all members present and future.   

    • Gold Top Dog

    I forwarded our version and hers to DH who asked what kind of drugs she's on!

    It would be nice for everyone to remember that not all of us are fortunate enough to be able to get high speed internet and that not everyone is able to VIEW the darned videos and might perhaps find it rather frustrating.

    Kate, you must remember how she was about the darned new rules and wanting to rewrite everything HER way.

    • Gold Top Dog

     I'm the one on drugs at the moment LOL....one of the advantages to my headaches is a cabinet full of pain killers....REALLY strong muscle relaxants....don't kill the pain but at least I've stopped caring about it LOL.

     I remember how she was with them yeah...and I remember the result of the TOS and how many people objected to how they were worded.  I tried VERY hard not to make this a new TOS, up to and including the word "guidelines" rather than "follow these or we'll kick you out".
     

    • Gold Top Dog

    Yeah, but he didn't mean YOU!  He meant our little witchy friend!

    In fairness Kate, I hated the "TOS" that PC and Ixas rammed down our throats.  Just yesterday, I pm'd mudpuppy and told her I would appreciate her changing her post in the Barking thread that our little friend oklielapitmomma had started.  And I titled the PM "ummmm, you can't say that" so it was VERY clear that she wasn't doing me a personal favor by editing herself.  Under the "TOS" that wasn't allowed.  Nope, slip once and you get a strike.  What garbage.  And, by gosh I couldn't PM anyone since PC made it very clear that she was reading everything I said to anyone off forum.  Gina didn't just leave moderating, she left the FORUM, so I'm guessing her opinion wasn't much higher than mine was!

    PC ONLY asked me to moderate I think because of the email I sent to Joel after her little "classified" fiasco. I think that Joel made that strong suggestion to her. Perhaps having something to do with keeping your friends close and your enemies closer..... And despite her "asking" Gina and myself our opinions of letting Ixas moderate, she totally blew off what we thought and let her have that power anyway.  I truely blame a lot of the forum issues on that team.  For heavens sakes, Jaime was getting emails, and not just from me, at home, at work and phone calls as well.

    There is NO way that anything you do can even approach that mess.  And, yes, I noticed "guidelines" instead of rules!