spiritdogs
Posted : 4/22/2006 11:46:57 AM
I do know that Ruby is a purebred Aussie
That was my point - if it's a purebred Aussie, call it an Aussie, not a mini Aussie. Personally, I believe that the
deliberate attempt to downsize the breed is not to its advantage. An Aussie should be able to guard and herd livestock. Ducks, not duckings. Sheep, not just lambs. Cattle (sometimes nasty kicking ones), not just calves.
Unfortunately, you will find some stronger sentiment than mine if you talk to real stockdog people. Think about it this way. Let's say you have a tiny dog that can do a really awesome job at finding people buried alive. Then, someone comes along who wants a big, flashy dog just like yours. So, they start breeding up the size (forgetting about other characteristics). Pretty soon, there are a lot of those big colorful dogs, but none of them can find any buried people. You, wanting to preserve the original people-finding dog, look for a mate for your dog. Suddenly, the only thing around are the big ones...not good enough, if you want the working qualities. That's what the stockdog people are up against. In a breed with a very small gene pool, it's a shame to diminish it by removing some of the dogs that represent the original qualities of the breed.
BTW, the ASCA standard is ONE standard, and all they really say about "minis" is that they are just small Aussies. So if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, unless you are simply in the biz of sellling lap ducks to unsuspecting people for big bucks, you'd call it a duck.
I think you should go for agility, or whatever, and give your Aussie a job, as she was meant to have. Just please, call her an Aussie - and if she is one, register her with ASCA.