orangedog
Posted : 10/6/2006 9:38:40 PM
1. They are smarter
2. They live longer
3. They love you just as much
4. Bonds are stronger because you can take them more places.
5. Easier to maintain
1. I don't agree with that at all. They may be smart, but I don't think they're smarter than my large dogs. They're also (in general) far more difficult to train in my experience.
2. Maybe, maybe not. That totally depends on the dog. I know an Australian Shepherd who is currently 17 and still going strong. There's a person on another board I frequent with a 16 year old Husky/Shepherd mix. I've known both big and small dogs to live past 18, and I've known them to live no more than 10 years.
3. Dogs are companion animals. No matter what size they are, they all adore their family. I find the larger dogs (of certain breeds) to be more loyal.
4. I don't take my small dog any more places than I take my large dogs...in fact, I can't think of any place that I could take Tia to that wouldn't allow one of my larger dogs aswell. I have a much stronger bond with Tango (medium/large dog) than I do with Tia (small dog). Dogs, no matter what size, will bond very closely to either their entire family or one person. Small dogs do not bond any more closely than a large dog.
5. Not necessarily. My large dogs are pretty easy to maintain. They're more quickly trained, don't get covered in whatever filth there is outside, they've got better teeth (small dogs often do have more dental problems than large dogs, even if taken care of), they don't eat as much as small dog people tend to think, etc.
You can have our own opinion, but please don't state them as facts. Dogs are dogs, and while I love them all, I'm definitely a medium to large dog person and don't appreciate having someobdy tell me that their dog is better than mine because of size.