elkhoundlover
Posted : 4/2/2006 5:00:51 PM
I think all of the above comments have merit when it comes to several breeds, not just sighthounds.
The 'sighthound' label contains some of the oldest breeeds. We don't have a lot of the larger historic prey that these dogs were bred to hunt here in the USA. Most guys (or gals) wouldn't be caught dead hunting rabbit or bragging about how well their dog did during a hunting expedition[X(]! There is just something about bringing down that waterfowl or pheasant that aces rabbit hunting!
Sighthounds DO NOT beg for attention. They are the loners in the dog world along with some other more independent breeds (usually the older ones). I have heard it said that they pick their owners instead of the other way around.
They look fragile. I know that their looks are deceiving but when you pick your dog for looks , you usually pick a more solid animal. Not many ranchers would pick the skinniest animal in the herd for their winter meat and that outlook of more being better (which at times really is) is pervasive in out culture.
If you own (or are owned by) a dog that is not a popular breed, count yourself lucky. There will always be people who will try to jump on any fad bandwagon to make money, regardless of who gets hurt in the process. I own a less popular breed than most sighthounds, at least in my area. I have had them called GSD mixes, Akitas, Chows, and Huskeys. They are still elkhounds and I don't hunt with them; I just enjoy their antics, their independence (most of the time), and their doggy breath when they are giving out kisses.
Yeah for unpopular dog breeds!!!!![
][
][
][
]