Liesje
Posted : 5/23/2007 2:26:29 PM
I personally don't have a problem with "designer" dogs. I feel like I would be talking out the side of my face if I bought a pure breed yet knocked those who bought mixed dogs. . I don't understand why someone would pay $800 for a mixed though, but I don't have a problem with it.
I only have a problem with puppy mills...
I feel the same, to an extent. I know some families who jumped on the labradoodle bangwagon and have been really happy with their labradoodles. To me, as long as you understand what you are (or are not) getting, it's not really any different than getting a lab/poodle mix from the pound. Another dog found a loving home, yay.
I guess what bothers me is that people try to make money breeding these mixes, people who usually have no business even breeding pure labs or pure poodles. It seems at iDog and in the fancing world in general, we like to describe an ethical, reputable breeder as someone who breeds for the improvement of their breed above all else. Assuming this, how can one possibly be an ethical breeder that is breeding mutts without any good proof of what genetic problems or improvements may or may not result? In my experience, the majority of people supplying designer mutts like labradoodles are not really trying to develop a new breed that is better than a lab or a poodle, they're only doing it to meet an arbitrary demand.
That's what I don't like about designer breeds.