Blogs

  • Long Overdue Pharmacy Follies...

    I know some of you get a kick out of these so here you go. Clicky here. Big Smile

  • New Years Pharmacy Follies...

    It's that time again.. new Pharmacy Follies!! Big Smile

  • Some Christmas Pharmacy Follies...

    For those who can't get enough of the antics that occur at my job, clicky here for the newest installment of Pharmacy Follies. Big Smile

  • New Pharmacy Follies!

    For those who get a kick out of my Pharmacy Follies, clicky here for the newest installment. Big Smile

  • More Pharmacy Follies...

    For those who follow my Pharmacy Follies... I have a new installment. Clicky here to check them out. Big Smile

  • Boston Terrier Info.. Olde Boston Bulldogge

    I'm sure you're wondering what an Olde Boston Bulldogge is. A lot of people are claiming that an Olde Boston Bulldogge is what Boston Terriers used to look like. Some people claim that's how a Boston Terrier was supposed to look like before "show folks" got a hold of it. Some people even claim that it was a breed that's as old as the Boston Terrier.

    The Boston Terrier was a breed created in 1863. It was created from various breeds which include English Bulldog, French Bulldog, American Pit Bull Terrier, White English Terrier and various "bull" and "terrier" types.  The Boston Terrier Club of America was created in 1891 and the Boston Terrier was recognized by the AKC in 1893. It took about 30 years to get recognition but the breed was still being defined. Here's some early Boston Terriers...

     

     

    Now the interesting thing is, according to this website, this was around the same time that the Olde Boston Bulldogge was created..

    "So while the Boston Terrier were being refined, and eventually developed into a toy breed, the original Boston Bulldog, which was considered not refined enough because it had too much bulldog influence, continued to be bred separately."

    What an interesting statement. And a false one. The Boston Terrier was not developed into a "toy breed". It is true that they were bred down in size. They originally weighed around 40lbs. The breed standard now allows between 10 to 25lbs. The Boston Terrier is not a "toy breed". It's not even in any of the Toy group of the AKC. It's in the Non-Sporting group.

    They also state that the Olde Boston Bulldogge continued to be bred separately. If that's so, why isn't there any documentation to support this? If this breed is as old as the Boston Terrier then why isn't it a recognized breed by any reputable registry? The history of the Boston Terrier was well kept. For example, here are pics of Boston Terriers throughout the years...

    And these are supposed to be Olde Boston Bulldogges of yesteryear...

    Doesn't it seem interesting that these dogs look like Boston Terriers in the breeds infancy? That's because they are Boston Terriers. The website reference claims that 2 different breeds were going on during the creation of the Boston Terrier. They claim there was a split. I have found this to be untrue simply because there is no documentation of this and the pictures they reference are those of early Boston Terriers whose history is very well documented.

    Now there is a registry that registers Olde Boston Bulldogges. The International Old English Bulldogge Association or the IOEBA. According to them, the Old Boston Bulldogge history is this...

    "The Olde Boston Bulldogge is the original Boston Bulldog.  This breed is of the original type and form that is documented by many old historic photos.  This breed was once known as the round-headed Bull and Terrier of the Boston area. The Olde Boston Bulldogge is the breed from which the Boston Terrier was developed, therefore the early history of the Olde Boston Bulldogge is the same as for the Boston Terrier.

    The Olde Boston Bulldogge is a separate and distinct breed from today's Boston Terrier.

    Much of the credit for preserving and re-establishing this rare breed should be given to the late Mr. Neil Rutan and his family. 
    "

    Again, if this breed is a "separate and distinct breed" then why is it not a recognized breed? Why is it considered a "rare" breed if it's been around since the creation of the Boston Terrier? The interesting part is they reference a few pictures...

    They claim this dog is "Outstanding example of the original type of Olde Boston Bulldogge predating today's Boston Terrier."

    That's interesting considering that this dog is CH. Captain Kinsman. A champion Boston Terrier.  Another picture referenced is of Helen Keller...

    The IOEBA states "Helen Keller in the year 1904 and her Olde Boston Bulldogge".  It's a fact that Helen Keller owned a variety of dogs. In fact, the first Akita brought into this country was owned by Helen Keller. However, there is much dispute over which breed of dog is shown in this picture. His name was Phiz and some people believe him to be either a Boston Terrier or an American Pit Bull Terrier. It's hard to tell...

    These pictures were taken in the early 1900's. Helen went to college in Massachusetts and considering the Boston Terrier originated in Massachusetts, it's very well possible that Phiz is a Boston Terrier. One thing is for sure, Phiz is never referred to as an Olde Boston Bulldogge anywhere except on the IOEBA website.

    Now let's move onto the breed standard. This is the general description of the Olde Boston Bulldogge...

    "General Description :  The perfect Olde Boston Bulldogge should be of small to medium height and size (not toy sized) with a round compact head and a solid, muscular and athletic body. The disposition should be outgoing, loyal, lively and intelligent.  The temperament is to be very stable and trustworthy.  Olde Boston Bulldogge are a healthy working dog without serious health problems.  Unlike their Boston Terrier cousins males should be free breeders and females should be free whelpers.  The Olde Boston Bulldogge should be devoid of all breathing problems.   Most importantly the Olde Boston Bulldogge is still a working Bulldog and as the Bulldogges of Olde, function should come before form."

    There are a few things in this that I'd like to address. The first one is...

    "Olde Boston Bulldogge are a healthy working dog without serious health problems."

    What type of work is the OBB supposed to do? I've often heard of OBB people claiming that the OBB still does the work that the Boston Terrier originally used to do. At the least, the Boston Terrier did vermin catching work. At the most, it was a small pit fighting dog. And considering what Boston Terrier history books have to say and what  pictures have to show...

    These pictures, and several others like them, lead me to believe that the Boston Terrier was used for fighting more than vermin catching. The reason I believe so is that a lot of Boston Terriers photographed from yesteryear often show them wearing thick spiked collars. These collars were either worn by fighting dogs in order to protect their necks while engaged in a fight or they were worn by dogs hunting animals such as wolves, bears or lions. Since Boston Terriers originated in Massachusetts and were about 40 to 50lbs at the most during the breeds' infancy, I highly doubt they were wearing these collars for hunting. So what work does the OBB do? It can't be dog fighting since that's illegal. Let's move onto another issue...

    "Unlike their Boston Terrier cousins males should be free breeders and females should be free whelpers."

    Uh, Boston Terrier males aren't "free breeders"? Since when? That's a new one. Now I'll give them the free whelping part. A lot of Boston Terrier bitches do not free whelp. I won't say that they can't because a lot of responsible breeders will not risk a *** and whelps lives in order to find out if she can free whelp. The reason for that is by the time you figure out she cannot free whelp, it can be too late. With that said, we're back to the working issue...

    "Most importantly the Olde Boston Bulldogge is still a working Bulldog and as the Bulldogges of Olde, function should come before form."

    Ok, I'm still confused as to what type of work the OBB is supposed to do. They mention "Bulldogges of Olde" which can be a reference to what the English Bulldog was bred for and that was bull baiting. Bull baiting was outlawed in 1835 in England well before the Boston Terrier was created.

    There are also other issues I have with the IOEBA. The interesting part is that they emphasize that this is a working dog but guess what? The IOEBA doesn't even sponsor or hold working dog events! Based on their events page, they are having one conformation show. So what is the point in emphasizing and encouraging of breeding dogs to do what they were originally bred to do, whatever that is, when this registry doesn't even sponsor or hold working dog events as a way to prove that these dogs are indeed working dogs?

    The biggest issue I have with the IOEBA is their FAQ regarding registration. Specifically these 2 things...

    "My dog never was registered but is purebred can I register with IOEBA? Yes. When you fill out the IOEBA single registration application and place as much information that you have in correct place on application and include a photo of your dog."

    And...

    "Can I register my dog with the IOEBA if I don't know the parents?  Yes, we know and understand that this information is often lost , misplaced or unavailable for various reasons beyond the control of the current owner.  This doesn't mean that your dog is not a verifiable pure bred and the IOEBA believes that all verifiable pure bred dogs deserve the right to be registered.  The IOEBA offers owners or breeders the opportunity to start over and begin a documented genealogical history of your pure bred dog that will be maintained in the IOEBA data base."

    Ok, the only proof they require is a picture and your word that the dog is a purebreed whatever. That means if you find a dog off the street and he sorta looks like an Olde Boston Bulldogge then you can register with the IOEBA. Considering you would have no idea about this dogs pedigree or the health issues behind it, how can the IOEBA claim they are breeding for healthy dogs when they allow the registration of dogs without known pedigrees? While the breeder could utilize health testing on that particular dog, they have no idea if any of its' ancestors/relatives had/have health problems and the dogs past can and will affect the future. Now if the OBB is as old as the Boston Terrier, why would you need a registry like this? Is it because the Old Boston Bulldogge really never existed and was nothing more than the Boston Terrier of yesteryear? You really can't say that the OBB was what the Boston Terrier was supposed to be. The Boston Terrier was created in 1863. That was 144 years ago. Compared to other breeds, it's considered a young breed. Take a look at these pics...

    These pictures were taken in the early 1900's.. 1910 at the latest. As you can see, these Boston Terriers look like those of today. So if it took between 37 to 47 years after the creation of the breed to get it the way it looks like still to this day, how can one say that this was not how Boston Terriers were supposed to look? 37 to 47 is a very short amount of time when it comes to dog breeding to set uniformity and if they managed to set it that quickly, it seems to me that the breeders and fanciers of yesteryear knew exactly what they wanted the Boston Terrier to be and they bred exactly for that.

    Now let's flash forward to today. These are Boston Terriers...

    These are Olde Boston Bulldogges...

    As you can see, there is no uniformity in this breed yet this is a breed that's supposed to be as old as the Boston Terrier. You can see what I mean by typing "Olde Boston Bulldogge" in a search engine and check out various websites. One website to check out is located on here. They reference a person who is claimed to have "preserved" the Olde Boston Bulldogge but if you see what their breeding stock looks like, you'll probably ask yourself "preserve what?".  I find that rather interesting that this kennel is credited with "preserving" and "re-establishing" the Olde Boston Bulldogge  breed yet none of their dogs resemble each other.  They sure don't look like the Boston Terriers of yesteryear so what exactly did they "preserve" or "re-establish"?

    Anyways, to make a long story short is the Olde Boston Bulldogge a real breed? No.

    Is the Olde Boston Bulldogge the dog the Boston Terrier used to be? No.

    Is the Olde Boston Bulldogge the dog the Boston Terrier was supposed to be? No.

    Would the Olde Boston Bulldogge be a great working dog? That depends on your definition of work and if you're in need of a working dog, you might want to be sure the dog you get comes from stock that's proven to work not just because someone says they can.

    Is the Olde Boston Bulldogge healthier than a Boston Terrier? That depends on the breeder and the dogs background. If the breeder is breeding unknown stock and is not utilizing health testing such as OFA, CERF, BAER and other things then they cannot say that the OBB is healthier than the Boston Terrier.

    Is the Olde Boston Bulldogge a "rare" breed that's worth more than what a show quality Boston Terrier would cost? No.

    Are you interested in an Olde Boston Bulldogge? If so, I highly suggest finding a responsible breeder of OBB's who is truly working to make it a real breed. You can find out how a breeder would go about doing that here. Or you can buy a bigger sized Boston Terrier from a responsible breeder. Trust me, they're out there.

    In the end, don't believe the hype and make sure you do research before buying any breed of dog.

    ********************************

    Special thanks to Kelly from Brickhouse Bostons for allowing permission to use King Arthur's picture.

    Special thanks to Pamela from Chrimaso Bostons for allowing permission to use Butler's picture.

    All other pictures come from my own personal pictures, The Boston Terrier and All About It, IOEBA, Bulldog Information and Got Pets Online.

     

    You can see the original article on Sekc's Zoo My Space. Clicky here.

  • Boston Terrier Info... A Boston of a Different Color

    As some of you know, I own Boston Terriers and I love the breed to pieces. I have written a couple of articles about them. This one is about different colored Boston Terriers. Enjoy!! Smile

    As you know, I own Boston Terriers. I just love the breed silly. I'm also fascinated by the history and the future of the breed. This is what a Boston Terrier should look like...

    Stunning isn't he? He exemplies what a Boston Terrier should be. Now take a lookie at this...

    If you think you're looking at Boxers, you're wrong. These are supposed to be Boston Terriers. Specifically red/fawn Boston Terriers that a lot of people are going nuts over. People are selling dogs like this claiming they are rare, when they aren't, and selling them for insane amounts of money.

    Back in the days when the breed was in it's infancy, a lot of breeds and mixes were used to create the Boston Terrier. These breeds include the now extinct White English Terrier, Bulldog, French Bulldog, maybe Pit Bulls, maybe Boxer but mostly various "bull" and "terrier" types. Considering how many breeds and mixes were thrown together, it stands to say that a variety of color would be introduced to the breed. Then again, the originators of the breed were more concerned with establishing type than establishing color.

    The Boston Terrier became a recognized breed in 1893. This is a standard for the breed that was noted to be in existence by 1891..

    OLD STANDARD

    GENERAL APPEARANCE AND STYLE: The general appearance of the Boston Terrier is that of a smooth, short-coated, compactly-built dog of medium station. The head should indicate a high degree of intelligence and should be in proportion to the dog's size; the body rather short and well-knit, the limbs strong and finely turned, no feature being so prominent that the dog appears badly proportioned. The dog conveys an impression of determination, strength and activity. Style of a high order, and carriage easy and graceful.

    SKULL: Broad and flat, without prominent cheeks, and forehead free from wrinkles.

    STOP: Well defined, but indenture not too deep.

    EYES: Wide apart, large and round, neither sunken nor too prominent, and in color dark and soft. The outside corner should be on a line with the cheeks as viewed from the front.

    MUZZLE: Short, square, wide and deep, without wrinkles. Nose black and wide, with a well defined straight line between nostrils. The jaws broad and square, with short, regular teeth. The chops wide and deep, not pendulous, completely covering the teeth when mouth is closed.

    EARS: Small and thin, situated as near corners of skull as possible.

    NECK: Of fair length, without throatiness and slightly arched.

    BODY: Deep and broad of chest, well ribbed up. Back short, not roached. Loins and quarters strong.

    ELBOWS: Standing neither in nor out.

    FORELEGS: Wide apart, straight and well muscled.

    HINDLEGS: Straight, quite long from stifle to hock (which should turn neither in nor out), short and straight from hock to pasterns. Thighs well muscled. Hocks not too prominent.

    FEET: Small, nearly round, and turned neither in nor out. Toes compact and arched.

    TAIL: Set-on low, short, fine and tapering, devoid of fringe or coarse hair, and not carried above the horizontal.

    COLOR: Any color, brindle, evenly marked with white, strongly preferred.

    MARKINGS: White muzzle, blaze on face, collar, chest and feet.

    COAT: Fine in texture, short, bright and not too hard.

    WEIGHT: Lightweight class, 12 and not to exceed 17 pounds; middleweight class, 17 and not to exceed 22 pounds; heavyweight class, 22 and not to exceed 28 pounds.

    DISQUALIFICATIONS: Docked tail and any artificial means used to deceive the judge.

    As you can see, it's a rather vague standard and this is where some people who breed for "off colored" Bostons go nuts. They claim that the original standard allowed for these colors and they are right but they seem to forget that the standard was revised in 1914.

    REVISED STANDARD

    GENERAL APPEARANCE: The general appearance of the Boston terrier should be that of a lively, highly intelligent, smooth coated, short headed, compactly built, short tailed, well balanced dog of medium station, of brindle color and evenly marked with white.

    The head should indicate a high degree of intelligence and should be in proportion to the size of the dog; the body rather short and well knit, the limbs strong and neatly turned; tail short and no feature being so prominent that the dog appears badly proportioned. The dog should convey an impression of determination, strength and activity, with style of a high order; carriage easy and graceful.

    A proportionate combination of "Color" and "Ideal Markings" is a particularly distinctive feature of a representative specimen, and dogs with a preponderance of white on body, or without the proper proportion of brindle and white on head, should possess sufficient merit otherwise to counteract their deficiencies in these respects.

    The ideal "Boston Terrier Expression" as indicating "a high degree of intelligence," is also an important characteristic of the breed.

    "Color and Markings" and "Expression" should be given particular consideration in determining the relative value of "General Appearance" to other points.

    SKULL: Square, flat on top, free from wrinkles; cheeks flat; brow abrupt, stop well defined.

    EYES: Wide apart, large and round, dark in color, expression alert, but kind and intelligent; the eyes should set square across brow and the outside corners should be on a line with the cheeks as viewed from the front.

    MUZZLE: Short, square, wide and deep; free from wrinkles; shorter in length than in width and depth, and in proportion to skull; width and depth carried out well to end. Nose black and wide, with well defined line between nostrils. The jaws broad and square, with short regular teeth. The chops of good depth, but not pendulous, completely covering the teeth when mouth is closed. The muzzle should not exceed in approximate length one-third of length of skull.

    EARS: Small and thin, situated as near corners of skull as possible.

    HEAD FAULTS: Skull "domed" or inclined; furrowed by a medial line; skull too long for breadth, or vice versa; stop too shallow; brow and skull too slanting. Eyes small or sunken; too prominent; light color; showing too much white or haw. Muzzle wedge shaped or lacking depth; down faced; too much cut out below the eyes; pinched nostrils; protruding teeth; weak lower jaw; showing "turn up." Poorly carried ears or out of proportion.

    NECK: Of fair length, slightly arched and carrying the head gracefully; setting neatly into shoulders.

    NECK FAULTS: Ewe-necked; throatiness; short and thick.

    BODY: Deep with good width of chest; shoulders sloping; back short; ribs deep and well sprung, carried well back of loins; loins short and muscular; rump curving slightly to set-on of tail. Flank slightly cut up. The body should appear short, but not chunky.

    BODY FAULTS: Flat sides; narrow chest; long or slack loins; roach back; sway back; too much cut up in flank.

    ELBOWS: Standing neither in nor out.

    FORELEGS: Set moderately wide apart and on a line with the points of the shoulders; straight in bone and well muscled; pasterns short and strong.

    HINDLEGS: Set true; bent at stifles; short from hocks to feet; hocks turning neither in nor out; thighs strong and well muscled.

    FEET: Round, small and compact, and turned neither in nor out; toes well arched.

    LEG AND FEET FAULTS: Loose shoulders or elbows; hind legs too straight at stifles; hocks too prominent; long or weak pasterns; splay feet.

    TAIL: Set-on low; short, fine and tapering; straight or screw; devoid of fringe or coarse hair, and not carried above horizontal.

    TAIL FAULTS: A long or gaily carried tail; extremely gnarled or curled against body.

    (Note: The preferred tail should not exceed in length approximately half the distance from set-on to hock.)

    COLOR: Brindle with white markings.

    IDEAL MARKINGS: White muzzle, even white blaze over head, collar, ***, part or whole of forelegs and hindlegs below hocks.

    COLOR AND MARKINGS FAULTS: All white; absence of white markings; preponderance of white on body; without the proper proportion of brindle and white on head; or any variations detracting from the general appearance.

    COAT FAULTS: Long or coarse; lacking lustre.

    WEIGHTS: Not exceeding 27 pounds, divided as follows:

    Lightweight: Under 17 pounds.
    Middleweight: 17 and not exceeding 22 pounds.
    Heavyweight: 22 and not exceeding 27 pounds.

    DISQUALIFICATIONS: Solid black, black and tan, liver and mouse colors. Docked tail and any artificial means used to deceive the judge.

    And here's the current standard...

    General Appearance - The Boston Terrier is a lively, highly intelligent, smooth coated, short-headed, compactly built, short-tailed, well balanced dog, brindle, seal or black in color and evenly marked with white. The head is in proportion to the size of the dog and the expression indicates a high degree of intelligence.

    The body is rather short and well knit, the limbs strong and neatly turned, the tail is short and no feature is so prominent that the dog appears badly proportioned. The dog conveys an impression of determination, strength and activity, with style of high order; carriage easy and graceful. A proportionate combination of "Color and White Markings" is a particularly distinctive feature of a representative specimen.

    "Balance, Expression, Color and White Markings" should be given particular consideration in determining the relative value of GENERAL APPEARANCE to other points

    Size, Proportion, Substance - Weight is divided by classes as follows: Under 15 pounds; 15 pounds and under 20 pounds; 20 pounds and not to exceed 25 pounds.

    The length of leg must balance with the length of body to give the Boston Terrier its striking square appearance. The Boston Terrier is a sturdy dog and must not appear to be either spindly or coarse. The bone and muscle must be in proportion as well as an enhancement to the dog's weight and structure. Fault: Blocky or chunky in appearance.

    Influence of Sex: In a comparison of specimens of each sex, the only evident difference is a slight refinement in the ***'s conformation.

    Head: - The skull is short, flat on top, free from wrinkles, cheeks flat, brow abrupt and the stop well defined. The ideal Boston Terrier expression is alert and kind, indicating a high degree of intelligence. This is a most important characteristic of the breed. The eyes are wide apart, large and round and dark in color. The eyes are set square in the skull and the outside corners are on a line with the cheeks as viewed from the front.

    Disqualify: Eyes blue in color or any trace of blue. The ears are small, carried erect, either natural or cropped to conform to the shape of the head and situated as near to the corners of the skull as possible.

    The muzzle is short, square, wide and deep and in proportion to the skull. It is free from wrinkles, shorter in length than in width or depth; not exceeding in length approximately one-third of the length of the skull. The muzzle from the stop to end of the nose is parallel to the top of the skull.

    The nose is black and wide, with a well defined line between the nostrils. Disqualify: Dudley nose.

    The jaw is broad and square with short regular teeth. The bite is even or sufficiently undershot to square the muzzle. The chops are of good depth, but not pendulous, completely covering the teeth when the mouth is closed. Serious Fault: Wry mouth.

    Head Faults: Eyes showing too much white or haw. Pinched or wide nostrils. size of ears out of proportion to the size of the head. Serious Head Faults: Any showing of the tongue or teeth when the mouth is closed.

    Neck, Topline and Body - The length of neck must display an image of balance to the total dog. It is slightly arched, carring the head gracefully and setting neatly into the shoulders.

    The back is just short enough to square the body. The is level and the rump curves to the set-on of the tail. The chest is deep with good width, ribs well sprung and carried well to the loins. The body should appear short.

    The tail is set on low, short, fine and tapering, straight or screw and must not be carried above the horizontal. (Note: The preferred tail does not exceed in length more than one-quarter the distance from setting on to hock.) Disqualify: Docked tail. Body Faults: Gaily carried tail. Serious Body Faults: Roach back, sway back, slab-sided.

    Forequarters - The shoulders are sloping and well laid back, which allows for the Boston Terrier's stylish movement. The elbows stand neither in nor out. The forelegs are set moderately wide apart and on a line with the upper tip of the shoulder blades. The forelegs are straight in bone with short, strong pasterns. The dewclaws may be removed.

    The feet are small, round and compact, turned neither in nor out, with well arched toes and short nails. Faults: Legs lacking in substance; splay feet.

    Hindquarters - The thighs are strong and well muscled, bent at the stifles and set true. The hocks are short to the feet, turning neither in nor out, with a well defined hock joint. The feet are small and compact with short nails. Faults: Straight in stifle.

    Gait - The gait of the Boston Terrier is that of a sure footed, straight gaited dog, forelegs and hind legs moving straight ahead in line with perfect rhythm, each step indicating grace and power. Gait Faults: There will be no rolling, paddling, or weaving, when gaited. Hackney gait. Serious Gait Faults: Any crossing movement, either front or rear.

    Coat - The coat is short, smooth, bright and fine in texture.

    Color and Markings - Brindle, seal, or black with white markings. Brindle is prefered ONLY if all other qualities are equal. (Note: SEAL DEFINED. Seal appears black except it has a red cast when viewed in sun or bright light.) Disqualify: Solid black, solid brindle or solid seal without required white markings. Gray or liver colors.


    Required markings: White muzzle band, white blaze between eyes, white forechest. Desired markings: White muzzle band, even white blaze between the eyes and over the head, white collar, white forechest, white on part or whole of foreleg and hind legs below the hock. (Note: A representative specimen should not be penalized for not possessing "Desired Markings".) A dog with a preponderance of white on the head or body must possess sufficient merit otherwise to counteract its deficiencies.

    Temperament - The Boston Terrier is a friendly and lively dog. The breed has an excellent disposition and a high degree of intelligence, which makes the Boston Terrier and incomparable companion.

    For those who don't understand how standards work, let me break it down to you. A standard is what a breed should look like. People who create the breed have the "perfect specimen" in mind and they write it down and breed to that. A standard can be changed and revised and the way it's usually done is that members of a breed club, such as the Boston Terrier Club of America, agree to it and vote on it with the majority winning. If you look at the revised standard and the standard of today, you can see how detailed it is compared to the old standard. Check out the Disqualifications. Note that it says "solid black, black and tan, liver and mouse colors". For those who don't know, liver is also another term for red/fawn/brown. Mouse is another term for grey/blue.

    Now I have no idea why these colors were excluded but *I* think it has to do with expression. Expression is very big in the breed. A lot of dogs that are red or grey tend to have light colored eyes and noses. That takes away from the expression. Here's an example...*

    Here's an example of "expression" per the breed standard...**

    Another reason could be that the Boston Terrier is considered the "American Gentleman" and that it's markings are supposed to take on a "tuxedo" look. Here's an example...***

    Since most tuxedos are black and white, I can see why these colors were excluded.

    Another thing I've noticed about "off colored" Boston Terriers is that very few of them actually resemble Boston Terriers. The majority look like miniature Boxers, American Staffordshire Terriers and mixes of those breeds. Look at the pictures I've posted. Some of those dogs have obviously docked tails which leads me to believe either they are not purebreed or someone didn't read the breed standard where it says docking is a disqualification in the breed.

    There isn't any health issues associated with them, not counting the ones that afflict ALL Boston Terriers, however a lot of irresponsible breeders are churning out all white Boston Terriers. This is a Boston Terrier with a lot of white...

     

    This is Ch. Lady Dainty. That's correct, she's a champion. Now, if she were to enter the ring today, she probably wouldn't go far if make champion at all.  This is Samuel Adams...****

    Now there's a thing with white Boston Terriers. A lot of white on a Boston Terrier, especially on the head, can indicate deafness. Deafness was introduced to the breed by the White English Terrier. It is believed that the majority of that breed were deaf and it's the main reason why the breed went extinct.

    With all that said, a lot of people are breeding for these colors with hopes that the BTCA will allow them. Let me rephrase that, very few people are breeding these colors in hopes that the BTCA will recognize them. A lot of people are breeding these colors because they know if they can market them as rare there will be an uneducated puppy buyer who will pay $3000 for one.

    I've been on various message boards and have spoken to various people over 10 years. A lot of people are claiming that one day the BTCA will recognize these colors yet they really aren't doing anything about it. They're talking the talk but aren't walking the walk.

    First off, the BTCA will NEVER recognize these colors. If the first revision included the exclusion of these colors what makes them think that they're going to be included now? Not only that, there is talk that the BTCA is going to revise the standard again and it's going to define the standard even more to a point to not to include these colors.

    Secondly, these colors will never be included if the majority of dogs being bred look like miniature Boxers. Very few look like Boston Terriers.

    Thirdly, if you're wishing for the recognition of these colors while hanging out on message boards/classifieds boards that allows everyone and their mother to hawk irresponsibly bred puppies, don't be too surprised when people don't take you too seriously when it comes to doing something that will help get these colors recognized.

    Fourthly, in all honesty, the best bet for the "off colored" BT folks is to create a separate breed. It worked just fine for the White German Shepherd Dog folks. Considering that the BTCA does not want these colors included in the standard, this may be the only way to go. And it can be done. Quite a few new breeds have been created in recent years. But that's if they want it to happen. And it's not going to happen if you're breeding a 30lb red Boston Terrier that looks like a Boxer and all you do is complain about how mean the BTCA is for not allowing red to be a recognized color. It will only happen when you get better breeding stock, you know a red Boston Terrier that actually looks like a Boston Terrier, utilize health testing to make sure it doesn't have any congenital defects and get together with like minded folk who want to do right by the dogs and are willing to write a standard, breed towards that standard and petition for recognized by a reputable kennel club.

    I'll be honest when I say, that I highly doubt this will ever happen. A lot of people have no incentive to do this when people are more than willing to pay big bucks for an irresponsibly bred dog that looks like an Amstaff so why should they strive to create a new breed? It's much easier to irresponsibly breed dogs and rake in money while complaining about the BTCA yet claiming one day these colors will be recognized yet you aren't doing a damn thing to achieve that.

    So to make a long story short, don't believe the hype. While I'm sure there are responsible "off colored" breeders out there, they are in the minority just like responsible breeders of "recognized colors" or of ANY breed are in the minority. These colors are not rare, they are not worth the price tag of what a show quality Boston would cost and until people take action, they will never be recognized by the BTCA nor will they ever become a separate breed.


    *Special thanks to Rachel from the Woofboard for allowing permission to use Ross' picture.

    **Special thanks to Danielle from Campbell Clan Bostons for allowing permission to use Dylan's picture.

    ***Special thanks to Pamela from ChriMaso Bostons for allowing permission to use Taison's picture.

    ****Special thanks to Jess from the Woofboard for allowing permission to use Samuel Adams picture.

    For further reading, check out these linkages....

    The Boston Terrier Club of America.

    The Boston Terrier Club of America FAQ(They speak about off colored Boston Terriers).

    The Boston Terrier and All About It. (This is an old school online book about the Boston Terrier written in 1910 by Edward Axtell. It's an excellent book about the breed).

    Boston Terrier History (A nice website that speaks of Boston Terrier history and has lots of pictures of Boston Terriers in the early years).

    Brown or Red and White Boston Terrier Board (This is a message board for brown/red/off colored Boston Terriers. Please be aware that they allow people to advertise puppies for sale and stud services. I am not posting this link because I support those actions. I am posting this link for those who are interested in learning more about off colored Boston Terriers by speaking to those who have them. Because they allow people to advertise on there, and if you are looking for an off colored Boston Terrier, please do research before you buy a puppy. This goes for any color dog and any breed of dog).

  • Pharmacy Follies...

    As some of you know, I am a pharmacy tech. I've been putting the "harm" in "pharmacy" for over 7 years. I deal with some interesting people and situations and I write about them on My Space. They're called Pharmacy Follies and for some strange reason, a lot of people find them maniacally funny. I'd post them here but they're chock full of curse words and I know that's a big no no here. So I'm going to post linkage to anyone who wants to see them. Clicky here. Big Smile

  • Holy smokes!

    So, I wake up the other day and as always, the first thing I do when I wake up, well besides after taking a morning tinkie, is go online. I go to check out Dog.com and discover it's gone! Needless to say, I damn near panicked. I've been a member of I-Dog for ages and it's one of my favorite dog message boards. I didn't know what happened to it but I was disappointed that no one gave us a heads up that they were going to jazz it up. Eh, maybe they did give us a warning but I missed it. Anyways, it looks like they really jazzed it up really nice but it looks like the forums aren't working yet. Well, at least, they aren't working for me. Hopefully they'll be up soon and since they're down, I should use this opportunity to take some pictures of my crackheads as it's been a while since I've posted some crackhead action. And on that note, I'm out like a stank fart!! Big Smile

 
 
Contact Us | Help | Rules & Conduct | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | About Us
Copyright 2007, PetsUnited LLC