Forum Post

The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

Last post 06-03-2008 9:22 PM by ron2. 81 replies.
Page 5 of 6 (82 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next >
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  • 05-30-2008 7:10 PM In reply to mudpuppy

    • DPU
    • Top 50 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-19-2006
    • Indiana
    • Posts 4,497
    • Points 365

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    mudpuppy:

    Anyway, I teach ZERO of my dogs to "watch me".  Seems pointless to me. I want to be so interesting on my own merits that they pay attention to me at all times, just in case. If your dog is so distracted from you that you have to issue a "watch me" command, regardless of how you taught it, it's too late. the dog is disconnected.

    Thanks for that comment because I never really saw the point of this thread or why anyone would have to teach the "watch me" command to the dog.  I guess its in the human to dog relationship that is built because my residence dogs and fosters are always keeping track of me.  With the exception of teaching a deaf dog to "check in" with me, I thought "watch me" is something all dogs do naturally..

    • Post Points: 0
  • 05-30-2008 7:24 PM In reply to spiritdogs

    • ron2
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-10-2007
    • far north central Texas
    • Posts 10,240
    • Points 505

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    Another thing I thought about dogs learning from dogs is the viewpoint of us humans.

    When a mother dog holds down a pup that's playing too rough, it's just as possible that she is waiting for the bite inhibition or change of attitude and releases the puppy. That is, mom controlling the play teaches puppies how to play. Granted, momma dog is not standing there with a treat bag, but she can control access to resources, such as her milk, continued play, even toys. No, I'm not pre-supposing a human value system in her training. Dogs training each other has little to do with human obedience. It has everything to do with survival as a group. So, while she is not thinking in human terms of OC, she is waiting for what she is looking for, so to speak.

    That's my totally baseless layman's idea of what might be happening with dogs training one another.

    There are other ways of dogs training each other. Traditional sled dog training requires putting a new dog in an established team. The new dog will learn by imitation and bumping along. Shadow learned how to play with a toy in an exact and specific way by watching a neighbor dog do it. That's a specific case of learning something but not as a result of another dog not allowing you to do it, but by learning by imitation.

    Shadow wasn't much of a barker until he met our other neighbor dogs, some bossy, mouthy Border Collies. At first he howled. But then he learned to bark.

    The way you treat your dog in this life determines your place in heaven. - chukchi proverb


    • Post Points: 0
  • 05-30-2008 7:36 PM In reply to DPU

    • ron2
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-10-2007
    • far north central Texas
    • Posts 10,240
    • Points 505

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    DPU:
    Thanks for that comment because I never really saw the point of this thread or why anyone would have to teach the "watch me" command to the dog.  I guess its in the human to dog relationship that is built because my residence dogs and fosters are always keeping track of me.  With the exception of teaching a deaf dog to "check in" with me, I thought "watch me" is something all dogs do naturally

    You raise a good point, as well as Mudpuupy did. I've worked on watch me sometimes, though I get as much or better response, even on leash, with the recall command. I have felt the need to work on attention to me since my dog is independent and doesn't have to listen to me unless I have something better to offer. He is the type that didn't respond as I had hoped to some punishments. So, I had to be the most interesting and valuable source of resource there is.

    But it's an excellent point to raise. However, one might say, the point of the exercise in question is to solidify the connection of dog to human. As LCK might put it, he wants the abililty to have that attention regardless of circumstance, without needing a treat in his hand, at the time.

    And I'm not saying that my experience is so different from others, just that, with having an independent predominate breed, Shadow can view his options as either listen or ignore. That's why I don't walk him off-leash. He will run off at the first interesting scent or thing and it has nothing to do with my worth as an amateur trainer. That's why I worked on recall and watch me. To hedge my chances a little better. I do make a mean brisket.

    The way you treat your dog in this life determines your place in heaven. - chukchi proverb


    • Post Points: 0
  • 05-31-2008 6:55 PM In reply to spiritdogs

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    spiritdogs:
    But, the deliberate creation of ADDITIONAL stress, more than what is required to learn a simple task, is what I am not comfortable with
    Lee Charles Kelley:
    Unlike you I'm not as concerned about the dog learning a "simple task." I'm concerned about much more than that. In a way your attitude is similar to what I used to come across when debating dominance trainers about their methods. Their answer was usually, "Hey, all I care about is that the dog does what I want him to." In other words, as long as the dog earns the "simple task," that's enough. It's not enough for me. I want the dog to learn not only to do things that I want him to, but to do it in a way that creates a stronger feeling of attraction toward me (the dog/human bond that's always talked about), and a stronger desire to play games that will release and reduce inner tension and stress.
    spiritdogs:
    I'm sorry, but as the owner of a dog that can complete simple and complex tasks, but isn't that inclined to play with objects, I'm not worried, so don't be so patronizing.

    I'm sorry if you felt patronized. I actually have a lot of respect for you. Many, if not all, of your posts are sensible, display a great deal of intelligence and learning, and show a deep commitment to making the world a better place for dogs. And I share all of those values.

    But the way I see things a dog who won't play, whether it's with objects or with its owners or other dogs, is missing a direct connection to the way nature has designed the dog to reduce internal tension and stress. And I've had a lot of clients who thought the way I did before I had to confront the problem of my dog Freddie's panic attacks: "My dog is perfectly well-behaved but doesn't like to play. So what?"

    Well, that's fine until something happens to throw the dog off balance. For me and Fred it was fine until we moved. And suddenly all this other stuff started to come out in him, mostly sheer panic. And it was only after exhausting all behavioral science avenues, which didn't work, and then by fasting him for two days and teasing him relentlessly by tying him to fence and playing fetch with another dog right in front of his nose -- until he was whining, crying, screaming, about to burst a blood vessel -- and THEN untying him and throwing the ball for HIM to chase, which he did with all his might, it was only then that his panic attacks disappeared. And I mean all fear vanished from him completely. I was able to train him to walk around New York City, often off-lead, and I was 100% certain that he would always not only able to respond to simple and complex commands, but would remain self-composed and confident under any and all circumstances.

    Was I happy about putting him through such stress? No. It made me feel sick to see him whining, crying, and straining to get at that tennis ball. I was ready to quit every single time his friend Mack brought the ball back. I felt the way a prize fighter probably does when his opponent lands a hard punch in the gut and he feels his knees give and his body start spinning, about to hit the canvas. But the 5 mins. of momentary frustration that I put Freddie through -- which was admittedly quite deep -- saved him from a lifetime of unrelenting fear and panic that just would NOT go away.

    So, again, when it comes to using stress in training I'm not so concerned with teaching a dog to obey simple OR complex tasks as I am in giving him the resilience, the emotional tools necessary to handle the worst kinds of stress he might encounter. And I'm not recommending doing what I did with Fred unless you a) know what the hell you're doing (meaning you have to be able to read your dog perfectly and know the exact moment when he's ready to be let loose), and b) your dog is in a deeply disturbed psychological state that can't be fixed by any other means.

    spiritdogs:
    I also have two dogs that do play with toys, but one is certainly more inclined to do so.  This has more to do with genetics than you are willing to admit.

    Every dog has a "spoon game" that will bring out the wolf in her. You just have to know how to find and nurture it.

    spiritdogs:
    An Aussie with heavy duty prey drive is different from a hound that probably got dumped because he wouldn't even hunt his natural prey.

    Probably? You can't base your approach on an assumption like that. What is actually MORE probable is that his owners fought him over his oral urges when he was a puppy, which caused his natural affinities for whatever predatory skills his breeding calls for to shut down. Those skills and the underlying emotions supporting them CAN be brought out in such a dog. And from my pov he'll be happier for it in the long run.

    spiritdogs:
    If you think that any of these three dogs DON'T have a strong attraction to me, you're just plain full of crap.  [Now, now, I never even suggested that; play nice!--LCK] Play may be the quickest route with some dogs, but it isn't the quickest route with ALL dogs.  By definition, a reinforcer is something the dog wants, not what you want him to want.

    I'm not talking about using play as a reinforcer. That idea, which is common in the +R world, is on my Top 10 List of Myths About Dogs (on my website). It's an article you've already read ("The Importance of Free Play"), and which you violently disagreed with because in it I suggest that puppy obedience classes are a bad idea and can cause learning deficits. (Talk about unnecessary stress for a puppy!) What I AM talking about is using play to heal a dog's wounded emotions; that's all.

    To recap: I think you've got a lot to offer the dog world. My view of the importance of deliberately frustrating a dog in certain situations in order to bring out his playfulness is based not on a need for teaching simple or complex commands but in reconnecting the dog to his natural heritage as a predator and educing what in some circles would be called "good working character." However I'm not concerned with using that character for any specific purpose except to reduce the dog's overall stress, and teach him he has the ability to handle such stress on his own.

    LCK 

    "Clicker training has not taught me a whole bunch, other than that people can get wrapped up in fads and catch phrases." Bob Bailey

    "If a lion could talk we would not be able to understand him." Wittegenstein. "If a lion could talk we would understand him perfectly, but we would learn very little about ordinary lions from him."Daniel C. Dennett

    "Dogs don't care who's alpha and who's not. Only emotionally dysfunctional owners and trainers do." Jack Field
    • Post Points: 0
  • 05-31-2008 6:56 PM In reply to mudpuppy

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    mudpuppy:

    but as the owner of a dog that can complete simple and complex tasks, but isn't that inclined to play with objects, I'm not worried, so don't be so patronizing.  I also have two dogs that do play with toys, but one is certainly more inclined to do so.  This has more to do with genetics than you are willing to admit. 

    I own a great dane with serious prey instincts, as in, will kill anything you've got to offer. He will NOT play. He played a bit as a pup, but not as an adult, presumably because he figured out that toy does NOT equal prey animal. Stupider dogs like border collies may be confused on that point. He KNOWS he is a serious predator. He also absorbed all of the tricks/obedience/whatever I have taught the other dogs, just by watching. Having your dog decide to weave or track after no training but just because he watched the other dogs do it is kind of disconcerting. Anyway, I teach ZERO of my dogs to "watch me".  Seems pointless to me. I want to be so interesting on my own merits that they pay attention to me at all times, just in case. If your dog is so distracted from you that you have to issue a "watch me" command, regardless of how you taught it, it's too late. the dog is disconnected.

     

    I totally agree with you on the point about "watch me", however, I do teach it to some of my dogs, not because I don't want to be interesting enough for them to check in with me frequently, but because it's just another behavior, and I classify it as just one in a long string of cutesie things that they can do to entertain the public.  There's really no reason to teach my dogs to "say their prayers" or to sneeze on command either, but it's fun.

    Big Smile 

    Regional Director for Massachusetts, International Positive Dog Training Association
    Director, SeniorCare Pawsitive Connections Program

    AKC CGC Evaluator #3669
    Therapy Dogs, Inc. Tester/Observer

    Sioux, CGC, TDInc.
    Maska, CGC, TDInc.
    Sequoyah, CGC
    Fergie, Retired Lap Dog, Age 19
    Dancer, CGC, TDInc. (1989-2006) #1 Heart Dog

    "If you talk to the animals they will talk with you and you will know each other. If you do not talk to them you will not know them and what you do not know, you will fear. What one fears, one destroys." - Chief Dan George

    "The fidelity of a dog is a precious gift demanding no less binding moral responsibilities than the friendship of a human being. The bond with a true dog is as lasting as the ties of this earth can ever be." ~ Konrad Lorenz



    • Post Points: 0
  • 05-31-2008 8:12 PM In reply to Lee Charles Kelley

    • ron2
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-10-2007
    • far north central Texas
    • Posts 10,240
    • Points 505

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    Another bit of understanding, at least for me.

    Let me preface by saying, in spite of what it may seem like when I post, I do not know everything and freely admit that. The older I get, the more I realize how much I don't know.

    I haven't encountered a dog that didn't want to play or was emotionally inhibited from playing.  But then I think of the neighbors behind me that now have a short, squatty little mix of a dog who doesn't really spend much time interact with the rest of the dogs around us, or even their cats, that I know of. Yet, seems perfectly adapted to the humans and doesn't seem distressed. Quite the opposite, the dog will do her business around the yard as if she were queen and need not worry about anything else. Shadow is all play. So, is the Dachshund next door. And the hound mix and Schnauzer mix on the other side of us. The Border Collies and the Heeler Mix work. The owners own that house and a farm and spend quite a bit of time on the farm. So, they are used to working cattle and don't seem to need much play. They just try and herd everything within an acre's view. But I have yet to encounter a dog that didn't know how to express their energy, either in play or work, of just being queen of the world. That is, I think some dogs don't play much but that's not necessarily a sign of emotional disability.

    The one thing I am confused on is how fasting the dog for such a time helps the play part of the scenario. I kind of agree with DPU in that I see to a dog's basic needs, first, then address behavior. The behavior mod methods are where he and I differ, sometimes.

    The way you treat your dog in this life determines your place in heaven. - chukchi proverb


    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 12:03 AM In reply to DPU

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    DPU:

    I thought "watch me" is something all dogs do naturally..

    It's not, and teaching the behavior is not exactly the point of the exercise. The point of the exercise, at least the way I do it, is to give a dog an alternative way of offloading his energy. For example when a leash-aggressive dog sees another dog coming toward him, he normally feels a surge of energy, correct? That energy is normally offloaded as barking, snarling, pulling to get at the other dog. If the dog knows "eyes," all I have to do is give him the command, he locks his eyes on mine, and all his aggression just disappears; it evaporates instantly. That's just one example. The basic structure is that whenever a dog can't contain his energy, for whatever reason -- skateboarders, wanting to jump up on people, wanting to chase the cat -- you just say "eyes," and as soon as he looks at you all that wild, uncontrollable emotional energy is gone and the dog becomes calmer and totally focused on you.

    To me that's a valuable training tool.

    LCK

    "Clicker training has not taught me a whole bunch, other than that people can get wrapped up in fads and catch phrases." Bob Bailey

    "If a lion could talk we would not be able to understand him." Wittegenstein. "If a lion could talk we would understand him perfectly, but we would learn very little about ordinary lions from him."Daniel C. Dennett

    "Dogs don't care who's alpha and who's not. Only emotionally dysfunctional owners and trainers do." Jack Field
    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 12:19 AM In reply to ron2

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    ron2:

    That is, I think some dogs don't play much but that's not necessarily a sign of emotional disability.

    The one thing I am confused on is how fasting the dog for such a time helps the play part of the scenario.

    As I said before, you might not see the dog's emotional instability (not disability) for months or even years because the dog has his coping mechanisms well in place. But when there's a sudden change in the underlying structural dynamic, the dog loses his emotional balance and becomes a nervous wreck in some way. It happens a lot. I'm seeing a client tomorrow whose dog was the most perfect pet for 7 years, well trained, well behaved, but they moved several times in the past year, and now the dog has such severe separation anxiety that they find him cowering in a corner, shaking uncontrollably, covered in his own *** when they come home. They tried drugs but the dog started having seizures, which is one of the side effects.

    As for fasting the dog, I've gone into that several times before in very specific detail. To re-reiterate, a dog's natural mechanism for dealing with stress is through his prey drive. Wolves (wild canids, if you like) don't like to hunt unless they haven't eaten for a few days. Hunger overcomes their normal, natural reluctance to engage in battle with an animal that could very well kill or maim one of them. So in this regard hunger is nature's way of overcoming fear.

    For canines, biting a prey animal is the way nature has devised for them to release the most stress. (Wolves kill and eat, their stress dissipates, they hang out around the den for a few days, get hungry, stress starts to build, get really hungry, stress builds even more, and it finally gets to the point that they go out and hunt again; it's a simple formula.)

    When a dog doesn't have access to the kind of activities that would normally relieve his internal stress, AND his internal stress has gotten to the point where he's in dire emotional straits and can't function in his daily life because of severe behavioral issues -- panic attacks, separation anxiety, even some types of aggression -- it's the trainer's job to teach him how to get to that end point that nature has put into place. And that means the dog has to be put in a state where he feels absolutely DRIVEN to chase something and bite it with all his heart. And since we want to be as humane as possible about this, we want to teach him to chase and bite a toy rather than a squirrel or another dog. Then, once the dog has that skill under his belt, once he's felt that kind of wild joy that was lying dormant inside him, all his fear is gone. Forever. It's that simple.

    You can get some dogs to that point without fasting them. But when there's simply no other choice, this is something that will really, really work.

    LCK

    "Clicker training has not taught me a whole bunch, other than that people can get wrapped up in fads and catch phrases." Bob Bailey

    "If a lion could talk we would not be able to understand him." Wittegenstein. "If a lion could talk we would understand him perfectly, but we would learn very little about ordinary lions from him."Daniel C. Dennett

    "Dogs don't care who's alpha and who's not. Only emotionally dysfunctional owners and trainers do." Jack Field
    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 7:25 AM In reply to DPU

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    DPU:
    Thanks for that comment because I never really saw the point of this thread or why anyone would have to teach the "watch me" command to the dog. 

    My girls naturally check in with me regularly. Shimmer is allowed full run offleash where I can take her offleash. Gaci's recall isn't as strong, so she's never offleash in the city now, but even on her long line (30 foot) she checks in with me regularly. When I'm walking they will go where I go, without my even saying a word. I can change direction and go somewhere else and know, without looking back, that they will be somewhere in the vicinity of me soon enough. Ironically my girls are much better behaved offleash than on *G*. It's as though they know that once the leash goes on there's a physical connection there so they don't have to physically check in with me as much, as they know I'm at the other end!

    However, I still taught watch me to both of my girls - moreso to Gaci than to Shimmer. I taught it solely because of their fears. It had nothing to do with my relationship with them, but I taught them to look to me when things are scaring them. Not to stare at me, but to glance at the scary thing and look back to me, so that a) they don't have the opportunity to stare and get more upset or upset the other person/dog - it keeps their arousal down low, as the more they stare, the more aroused they get, and b) to be able to walk quickly by something that might normally cause a reaction, as the point of working with fearful animals is not to cause a reaction to occur at all.

    It's not about whether it's *natural* or not. Gaci has a strong aversion to direct eye contact from people, except from me. She loves my family but will still get put off if they stare at her for long (not that they do it on purpose!) I had to first teach her to break eye contact with people on her own, and then later on work to increase her tolerance for prolonged eye contact from strangers, with the ability to break it off if/when needed. Shimmer doesn't care, and if you look at her it must mean you want lovins! :-) But any behaviour has a purpose at some point in time.

    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 8:39 AM In reply to ron2

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    ron2:
    However, QM was based on the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
     

    "What's the Uncertainty Principle?"

    "I'm not sure..."

    Sorry, couldn't resist.

    Carry on! 

    "Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life." (Pratchett, Jingo)

    "I used to look at [my dog] Smokey and think, 'If you were a little smarter you could tell me what you were thinking,' and he'd look at me like he was saying, 'If you were a little smarter, I wouldn't have to.'" - Fred Jungclaus
    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 8:43 AM In reply to Lee Charles Kelley

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    Lee Charles Kelley:

    rare_bear:
    Are rocks conscious?

    To a degree, yes. A rock has whatever form of consciousness is necessary for it to be a rock.

     

    I am so loving this thread.  This is the kind of thing I talk about at 5am after a night of too much absinthe..... 

    "Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life." (Pratchett, Jingo)

    "I used to look at [my dog] Smokey and think, 'If you were a little smarter you could tell me what you were thinking,' and he'd look at me like he was saying, 'If you were a little smarter, I wouldn't have to.'" - Fred Jungclaus
    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 8:47 AM In reply to Lee Charles Kelley

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    Lee Charles Kelley:
    DPU:

    I thought "watch me" is something all dogs do naturally..

    It's not, and teaching the behavior is not exactly the point of the exercise. The point of the exercise, at least the way I do it, is to give a dog an alternative way of offloading his energy. For example when a leash-aggressive dog sees another dog coming toward him, he normally feels a surge of energy, correct? That energy is normally offloaded as barking, snarling, pulling to get at the other dog. If the dog knows "eyes," all I have to do is give him the command, he locks his eyes on mine, and all his aggression just disappears; it evaporates instantly.
     

    Yes you are right.  That is what happened with my dog.  It was a great way to a) diffuse the situation (or is it defuse?) and also b) start building a positive association with the trigger (because he got rewarded for looking at me instead of barking).  However I DIDN'T do it exactly as you did it, so I'm STILL not seeing the major difference...  I suppose I'll leave it anotehr couple of pages and come bk and chk again....

    "Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life." (Pratchett, Jingo)

    "I used to look at [my dog] Smokey and think, 'If you were a little smarter you could tell me what you were thinking,' and he'd look at me like he was saying, 'If you were a little smarter, I wouldn't have to.'" - Fred Jungclaus
    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 9:31 AM In reply to Lee Charles Kelley

    • ron2
    • Top 10 Contributor
    • Joined on 09-10-2007
    • far north central Texas
    • Posts 10,240
    • Points 505

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    Thanks for explaining your view of the fasting. It seems similar to what Skinner would do, to let his animals get hungry before they engaged in test. The training books I have read have also suggested that you can use part of the meal during training. Or, if you have a dog who's weight is critical, then whatever amount of food you use in training, decrease the amount in the regular meal by that much. For a small dog that eats a cup of food a day, you truly would end up feeding their meal in training. I have a big dog and gaining half a pound won't hurt him. So, the principle is that a dog that is hungry enough will do anything, including hurtling past his inhitibions or anxieties. I haven't had experience with tying a dog out with no food. So, I don't doubt the unease you felt about doing that. I probably would have gone to a vet and got a scrip for anxiety meds to get the dog calm enough to listen to training then discontinue the meds once training is in place.

    The way you treat your dog in this life determines your place in heaven. - chukchi proverb


    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 12:23 PM In reply to ron2

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    ron2:
    I probably would have gone to a vet and got a scrip for anxiety meds to get the dog calm enough to listen to training then discontinue the meds once training is in place.
     

    This was 15 years ago before Nicholas Dodman turned too many of our dogs into another part of Prozac Nation. 

    And I don't even have any idea what you mean by getting the dog calm enough to listen to training. Freddie was already very well-trained, and would listen to any command and obey it, except when he heard certain noises. When he went into panic mode he couldn't see me, he couldn't hear me, all he could do was try to run in any direction possible. So curing those panic attacks had nothing to do with any training being "in place," it had to do with bringing his instincts and emotions back into balance so that nothing threw him off balance ever again.

    I hope this helps you understand it better.

    LCK 

    "Clicker training has not taught me a whole bunch, other than that people can get wrapped up in fads and catch phrases." Bob Bailey

    "If a lion could talk we would not be able to understand him." Wittegenstein. "If a lion could talk we would understand him perfectly, but we would learn very little about ordinary lions from him."Daniel C. Dennett

    "Dogs don't care who's alpha and who's not. Only emotionally dysfunctional owners and trainers do." Jack Field
    • Post Points: 0
  • 06-01-2008 12:24 PM In reply to Chuffy

    Re: The "Eyes" Exercise - a Bit Different from "Watch Me"

    Chuffy:
    However I DIDN'T do it exactly as you did it, so I'm STILL not seeing the major difference... 

    I don't either Chuffy. But the end result is the same, and regardless I've come to the conclusion that it doesn't matter what *we* see, or we try to theorize to explain it. It's what the dog sees (and feels) that matters, and how the dog's behaviour changes. If I do it my way, you do it your way, and LCK does it his/her way, and all of the dogs end up with less stress, no aggression, increased confidence, and relief of tension, then really, it dosen't really matter what frame of -ology (or -physics) you put on it. The dog ended up helped and feels a heck of a lot better for it.

    • Post Points: 0
Page 5 of 6 (82 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next >
 
 
Contact Us | Help | Rules & Conduct | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | About Us
Copyright 2007, PetsUnited LLC