DPU
I do like this part of your post and I admit this is what I have been trying to express. So many times when a dog has a problem we jump right into behavior modification techniques rather than looking whether the dog's needs are met.
I agree with you, a lot. Honestly. I don't think I've ever disagreed with you on that. :-) When Gaci developed obsessive tendencies for the first time, when she was just under a year of age, I ended up putting her on clomipramine for it. Her tendency at the time, was digging. Not destructive digging, but an anxious need-to-dig-to-the-other-end-of-the-world digging. On couches, chairs, the kitchen chairs, on the plain ole floor, under beds, under tables. Wherever she was she felt this need to dig! I had her examined for a medical issue and she was otherwise completely healthy. It wasn't what I wanted, to put her on meds, but it worked for her to take the edge off, at the time it was what she needed while I started looking into what was going on in her life.
She was the one who led me to find clicker teaching. Before that, while I had a lot of the philosophy that I do now, I had never touched a clicker. I am so devoted to my guys in that way, that I will go out on a limb to try anything. You wouldn't believe how skeptical I was when I started working with a clicker. It felt awkward and artificial, much like what some people discuss on here. But from reading how much it helped other people and their dogs, I gave it a shot. And once we started with that, we were, most literally, on our way. We also started a specific exercise regimen that involved specifically just free-walking. Not directed walking, but walking that allowed her to decide what she wanted to do, on a long line (at the time she was not off-leash taught). We strolled through the fields, through the woods, I just went with her and let her be her. That's not to say we hadn't done that before, but now I made it a habit to focus on her (rather than taking a bunch of dogs, or even two dogs). At the same time I started some modified T-Touch massage techniques, and we did it every evening, and if not at least five days per week. Within four months I was able to wean her back off her meds, and she never has required them again. On two other occasions she began showing some obsessive urges again (after her spay surgery at 1.5 years, and then a few months ago after her surgery for a tucked vulva), brought on by stress. I couldn't exercise her much due to her condition, and she couldn't run through brush. Especially after her vulva surgery which resulted in 50 stitches between her vulva and anus, she wasn't allowed to be that active. So I upped her clicker lessons again, for simple things she could do calmly, as well as used T-touch massages. By my simply listening to her, and answering her need (in this case it wasn't a physical need, but an emotional one, but just as important), she got over it within the day and never looked back. All she needed was a little comfort and understanding, which I provided to her.
To make a long story short, she didn't need behaviour modification, or any sort of 'program'. She just needed me to recognize that she was feeling a certain way, to acknowledge it, and to help her deal with it. Massage helped with the touch and physical contact she was seeking, and the clicker helped to distract her and switch her focus. Her need was emotional, but it was a need.
I very much believe that a lot of behaviour problems that people experience can be 100% solved by meeting a dog's real needs. In fact, I would offer that most everyday issues would. But there are cases where meeting a dog's needs is not enough. And it is those cases that I do turn to science and behaviour modification for. I live with two of those types of dogs (three actually, but two are mine).
I am a psych major, as some people know. But I think some people here also realize that I am just as spiritually connected to my pups as the next person is. I talk of emotions, needs, relationships, as being the most important things to me for my dogs. All of those thigns are thigns you can't study scientifically. But I feel them, I believe in them, and I study them (you would call a lot of these things qualitative study, as data is not quantified). Believe me when I tell you it leads to interesting conversations in my psych classes. ;-) As much as those things are important to me, I also see the usefulness of everything my psychology degree is providing me, and I just love the instrumental conditioning, classical conditioning, habituation, all that jazz. I can't get enough of it. And because I tend to post mostly in the behaviour sections, I also take part in a lot of scientific discussions. To be honest, for me it's not "just behaviour", as somebody once said. Behaviour is part of it, but I always look deeper, beyond what you see on the outside. To me, you often have to change what's on the inside first before the outside can begin to make change. It's why I do so love people like Turid, Clothier, and others as they have a philosophy similar to mine in a lot of ways. It's not one or the other to me, both are equally instrumental in my life with dogs, and they intertwine in very complex ways. I cannot really separate one from the other, as the principles I learn from, say, clicker work, is something that I apply every day without the use of a clicker as well.
I agree that list probably isn't in the best order. I don't think it was ever intended to be in order, unless I'm mistaken, more just listing them out as all being important to a dog's well being. I just like the list as a whole to give people an idea of what it means to treat a dog like a dog, and fulfill the dog, as a dog's, needs.