Fenris
Posted : 10/9/2009 9:49:36 AM
Thanks again, to everyone. This is a good thread.
I'm not worried about feeling lazy, though I understand what the poster meant by that. We don't give up at the prospect of work. The first dog, our rescue, has actually been a lot of work. She's given me more than her share of trouble with resource guarding and fear reactivity. I've had to learn as I went, made many mistakes, but by now have a reasonably calm girl who I can trust to back down and not cause fights on her own any more. I had advice from competent sources to re-home her or take her back to the shelter. I didn't. She is a reactive, defensive, fearful dog who would not have an easy time finding another good home. She's mine for better or worse, and over time it did work out.
In other words, I know the work involved rehabilitating a dog, and I'm willing to do it.
This current problem is just at the very limits of my capacity. That's the issue. I'm responsible for taking on more dog than we were prepared for and for letting the problem sneak up on me. I like to think I should know better, but then again these three dogs interacted so well together that I just got complacent. Fortunately, both the boxer and bullmastiff are very placeable. They're attractive, smart, and socialized. They're even used to mobs of rampaging kids in close quarters. Either one is a great family dog, just not together. There just isn't the need, other than to satisfy our own feelings, to subject them and the family to the stress of desensitizing them to each other. If I thought it could be done within a reasonable time and we could be reasonably safe once done from anything but the occasional ownership scuffle, then I'd go for it, muzzles, crates, rotating, and all. The consensus I'm seeing is that I can't. It's a long, drawn-out process with lots of stress and high risk.
The bullmastiff is just not going to back down from a challenge, and the boxer has shown over and over that he will challenge. We need to be a two-dog home.